Online casino with £1, £5, £10 or £15 deposits
Available in GBDeposit thresholds, qualifying amounts and bonus rules are separate checks, and the live offer terms determine which conditions apply.
Table of Contents
- What a £15 Deposit Does—and Does Not—Tell You
- £1, £5, £10 or £15: Read the Deposit Threshold Separately from the Offer
- £15 and 15 Pounds: The Same Deposit, Different Search
- Before Depositing: Check the Bonus Terms, Not the Headline
- Slots, Game Contribution and Bonus Wagering
- Mobile Deposits and the Qualifying-Deposit Clock
- A £15 Deposit Bonus: Calculate the Wagering Before Counting the Reward
- PayPal and a £15 Deposit: Eligibility Still Depends on the Offer
- “Not on Gamstop” Is Not a Licence Check
- Real-Money Deposits and Bonus Funds Are Not the Same Balance
What a £15 Deposit Does—and Does Not—Tell You
A £15 minimum deposit describes an amount associated with funding a casino account. It does not, by itself, establish that a First Deposit Bonus will be available or that £15 is enough to qualify for one. Those are separate conditions: the account deposit threshold concerns the amount accepted, while the bonus terms specify the qualifying deposit for that particular offer.
The distinction matters because the amount shown beside an account or payment option can be mistaken for the amount needed to trigger a reward. A £15 deposit may meet an advertised deposit threshold without meeting the bonus’s qualifying deposit. The reverse can also be true: an offer’s qualifying deposit may be lower than the amount deposited, but that does not make the bonus terms interchangeable with the account threshold.
A specialist review reports bonus qualifying deposits of £10, £20 or £50, and describes £10 as the minimum required for most UK casino bonuses. Those figures are a report of the reviewed market, not a permanent rule for every operator or offer. The live terms determine the threshold that applies. In that range, £15 would clear a £10 qualifying deposit, but fall short of a £20 or £50 requirement. The arithmetic is plain; the uncertainty lies in which condition the offer actually sets.
If you’re considering a casino that accepts deposits of £1, £5, £10 or £15, payout timing is one detail worth checking. This list gives a brief reference point for the information available about each operator.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days EvoSpin lists a payout speed of 1–3 business days. This is the stated timeframe to consider when reviewing its payment information.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days Dieselwin lists a payout speed of 1–3 business days. Check its payment information for the stated timeframe.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days SlotoSport lists a payout speed of 1–3 business days. That is the available detail on its payouts.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days x3bet lists a payout speed of 1–3 business days. This gives a stated timeframe to bear in mind when reviewing its payment information.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days Britsino lists a payout speed of 1–3 business days. That is the available information about its payout timing.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days WinBeast lists a payout speed of 1–3 business days. Consider this stated timeframe when checking its payment information.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days NightLuck lists a payout speed of 1–3 business days. This is the available detail on how quickly payouts are processed.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days BeOnBet lists a payout speed of 1–3 business days. Its stated payout timeframe is the key detail available here.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days Revery Play lists a payout speed of 1–3 business days. This is the available information on its payout timing.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days Chanze lists a payout speed of 1–3 business days. Keep this stated timeframe in mind when reviewing its payment information.
That is why “£15 minimum deposit casino” can describe more than one situation. It might refer to an account-level deposit threshold, or it might be shorthand for a casino offer that requires a £15 qualifying deposit. The wording alone does not settle which meaning applies. A page headline may foreground a deposit amount while the reward’s terms set a different qualifying figure. Treating the two as one number converts a headline into a promise it has not made.
The same care applies when an offer advertises a bonus alongside a deposit amount. The deposit figure can be an entry condition rather than a description of every deposit the account will accept. It may also be only one condition among several. The presence of a £15 figure does not establish that every new customer can claim the reward, or that depositing that amount automatically activates it. Eligibility and the offer’s stated qualifying deposit remain decisive.
A useful reading separates three pieces of information: the amount that can be deposited, the amount that qualifies for the offer, and the amount of reward attached to that qualifying deposit. A single headline may not show all three. If the terms give a qualifying deposit of £20, a £15 payment does not satisfy that condition, even if the casino’s page is framed around £15 deposits. If the qualifying deposit is £10, the same £15 payment clears that threshold, but the remaining offer conditions still apply. Meeting one condition is not the same as meeting all of them.
The phrase “minimum deposit” therefore needs a clear object. Minimum deposit to do what: fund the account, qualify for a particular offer, or receive a stated reward? Without that distinction, the figure is incomplete. A casino can have one threshold for depositing and another for bonus eligibility; an advertised amount should not be read as evidence that those thresholds match.
For someone comparing a £15 deposit with an offer, the practical question is not whether £15 appears in the headline. It is whether the live terms define £15 as the qualifying deposit for that reward. If they do not, the amount alone tells little about bonus access. A concise offer panel may give the first impression, but its qualifying-deposit condition supplies the relevant test.
The label is still useful when read narrowly: it identifies the amount being discussed, not the full commercial terms. A £15 deposit is a transaction amount. Bonus eligibility is a separate contractual condition attached to an offer. Keeping those categories apart avoids counting a reward before its qualifying requirement has been met—and avoids treating an advertised deposit threshold as proof of what the bonus will pay.
£1, £5, £10 or £15: Read the Deposit Threshold Separately from the Offer
A deposit amount and a bonus qualifying deposit answer different questions. The first is the amount placed into an account; the second is the amount an offer requires before its terms apply. A figure shown as a minimum deposit should therefore not be read automatically as the entry point for a First Deposit Bonus.
A casino may accept a low account deposit threshold while requiring a higher qualifying deposit for a bonus to be triggered.
The distinction matters across the full range of £1, £5, £10 and £15. A low account threshold, where offered, would describe how little can be deposited. It would not establish that a bonus is available at that amount. Conversely, a bonus may set its own qualifying deposit above the account’s deposit threshold. The account can accept a smaller sum while the promotion remains out of reach.
A specialist review reports bonus qualifying deposits of £10, £20 or £50, and says that most casino bonuses in the UK require at least £10. These are reported figures, not a rule that makes every offer identical. The particular promotion determines its own condition. That leaves the four deposit amounts with different implications: £1 and £5 fall below the £10 figure reported as common in that review; £10 reaches that figure; and £15 is above it, but below the £20 and £50 qualifying-deposit examples also reported. None of those comparisons alone confirms eligibility for a particular offer.
What each amount establishes
£1 is a small deposit amount, but the amount itself says nothing about whether a casino account will accept it or whether a promotion will count it. If an offer sets a qualifying deposit above £1, depositing £1 would not meet that condition. The useful distinction is not between a “small” and “large” bonus deposit; it is between the amount deposited and the qualifying amount named in the offer.
£5 works the same way. It is a stated sum, not evidence of a £5 bonus threshold. Where an offer specifies a higher qualifying deposit, a £5 deposit does not become eligible simply because it is accepted into the account. The deposit may remain real-money funds while the promotional condition is unmet.
£10 aligns with the minimum figure that the specialist review describes as applying to most UK casino bonuses. That makes it a relevant comparison point, not a universal pass mark. An offer may set a different qualifying deposit, and the reported examples include higher thresholds. A £10 deposit therefore cannot be treated as proof that a First Deposit Bonus will be credited.
£15 sits above £10 but does not reach £20 or £50. This arithmetic helps compare the amount with the reported thresholds, but it does not determine what an individual promotion accepts. If an offer’s qualifying deposit is £10, £15 is numerically sufficient for that condition; if its threshold is £20 or £50, it is not. The actual offer terms, rather than the deposit label, settle the question.
Two thresholds, not one
The phrase “minimum deposit” can be ambiguous. It may refer to the smallest amount accepted for an account deposit, or to the minimum qualifying deposit required by a bonus. Those are not interchangeable. A displayed account threshold cannot be used as a substitute for the offer’s condition, and a qualifying-deposit figure should not be assumed to describe every deposit the account will accept.
This distinction also prevents a common arithmetic mistake: treating any deposit above a headline minimum as sufficient for a promotion. If the deposit is £5 and the qualifying threshold is £10, the account balance has increased, but the stated promotional condition has not been met. If the deposit is £10 and the offer requires £20, the same difference remains. The amount deposited does not round up to the amount required.
These amounts fall below the £10 figure reported as common for most UK casino bonuses.
This aligns with the minimum figure described as applying to most UK casino bonuses.
This is above the £10 common threshold, but below the £20 and £50 examples reported.
The reverse is equally important. A qualifying-deposit condition is not evidence that smaller deposits are impossible for ordinary account use. It establishes only what is required for that offer. The account’s deposit rules and the promotion’s eligibility terms have separate jobs.
For a comparison of £1, £5, £10 and £15 deposits, the reliable reading is therefore conditional: identify the deposit amount, then compare it with the qualifying deposit stated for the specific offer. The figures in a specialist review provide context for why £10 is a notable dividing point, while its £20 and £50 examples show why crossing that point is not enough to settle every case. The amount on the deposit button is only one part of the calculation; bonus eligibility follows the promotion’s own threshold.
£15 and 15 Pounds: The Same Deposit, Different Search
“15 pounds” and “£15” describe the same amount in different written forms. The wording may vary, but the deposit value does not: a casino asking for a £15 deposit is asking for fifteen pounds, not a separate payment category. A phrase such as “minimum deposit of £15” describes the lowest amount the operator will accept for a deposit. It does not, by itself, describe how a bonus is calculated.
That distinction matters because a deposit and a bonus are separate amounts. If an offer is expressed as a deposit match, the deposit is the money paid in and the bonus is the additional amount offered under the promotion. A wagering requirement is then applied to the bonus amount specified by the terms, rather than automatically to the deposit. The headline deposit figure alone cannot establish the amount that must be wagered.
A specialist review illustrates the arithmetic with a £20 bonus carrying a 10x wagering requirement. The calculation is £20 multiplied by 10, which produces £200 in wagering on the bonus component. The result is not a claim about what a £15 deposit earns, or a typical offer attached to that deposit. It shows what the stated multiple means when applied to the stated bonus amount.
The calculation can be written plainly:
- Bonus amount: £20
- Wagering multiple: 10x
- Required wagering on the bonus: £20 × 10 = £200
The £200 is the total stake required under that example’s stated rule. It is not the amount of the bonus, nor a promise that £200 will be returned. Wagering measures how much must be staked; it does not guarantee a particular result from those stakes. The arithmetic is fixed, while the outcome of play is not.
A £15 deposit cannot be substituted into that example as though it were the bonus. Doing so would change the calculation’s basis. If a promotion provides a bonus calculated from the deposit, the bonus amount must first be established from the offer’s terms; only then can its wagering requirement be calculated. Without those two details, a deposit figure cannot produce a reliable wagering total. The same applies whether the amount is written as “15 pounds” in prose or as “£15” in an offer.
This is why a stated minimum deposit of £15 and a bonus figure should be read as different entries in the offer, even when they appear beside each other. One tells the customer how much must be deposited to meet that stated threshold. The other identifies the promotional value to which any wagering multiple may apply. Treating them as interchangeable can make the apparent cost of a promotion look smaller or larger than the actual calculation supports.
Bonus Wagering Calculation
Determine the specific bonus value awarded (e.g., £20).
Identify the multiplier required by the terms (e.g., 10x).
Multiply the bonus amount by the multiple (£20 × 10 = £200) to find the required wagering.
The calculation also needs to be read as a rule about bonus funds, not as a forecast of cash available for withdrawal. A wagering requirement sets the amount of play needed before bonus value can become withdrawable, subject to the offer’s conditions. The fact that a deposit has been made does not change the arithmetic applied to a separately stated bonus. Nor does completing the required wagering itself establish what balance remains; that depends on the results of play and the applicable terms.
For a £15 deposit, the useful calculation therefore begins only after identifying the bonus amount and its wagering multiple. If the offer states a bonus of a particular value and a specific multiple, multiplication gives the required wagering on that bonus. If either input is absent, the total cannot be calculated from the deposit alone. A clean-looking deposit figure is not a substitute for the two numbers that drive the wagering arithmetic.
The written form is the easy part: fifteen pounds is £15. The financial distinction is less forgiving. A deposit amount identifies money paid into the account; a bonus amount identifies promotional value; a wagering multiple determines the required turnover on the amount named by the terms. Keeping those figures separate prevents a deposit headline from being mistaken for a complete account of the offer.
Before Depositing: Check the Bonus Terms, Not the Headline
A headline identifies the advertised reward; it does not establish who can claim it or what the reward will be worth after conditions are applied. For a £15 minimum-deposit offer, the useful comparison is between the live terms and the intended deposit, not between promotional labels. Practical value rests on the reward, eligibility, qualifying deposit, game contribution, expiry and withdrawal rules.
Confirm eligibility first
Check whether the offer is for new customers, existing customers or a defined group, and whether a particular registration or payment condition applies. A First Deposit Bonus is generally a one-time decision at operator level: players can typically take only one new-player offer from the same operator. Where there is a choice between promotions, the selection matters because accepting one may rule out another.
Household restrictions can also affect eligibility. Casino terms commonly restrict bonus claims to one per household or IP address. That can make separate accounts at the same address ineligible even where the account details differ. The terms should be read before registration or deposit, rather than treated as a formality after a claim is declined.
Match the qualifying deposit to the offer
The advertised deposit threshold and the qualifying deposit are not necessarily interchangeable. The terms specify the amount that must be deposited for the reward to apply, and whether the deposit must meet that condition in a particular way. A £15 minimum deposit, by itself, does not confirm that a £15 payment qualifies for a stated bonus.
- Match the qualifying deposit to the live offer terms.
- Check the maximum cap on a Deposit Match Bonus.
- Assume the advertised deposit threshold is the bonus qualifying amount.
- Expect a larger bonus by depositing beyond the stated cap.
The cap on a Deposit Match Bonus also matters. If the reward is calculated as a percentage of the deposit but stops at a stated maximum, depositing beyond that cap does not produce a larger bonus. The relevant figure is therefore the reward actually available at the planned deposit, not the most prominent percentage in the promotion.
Read the restrictions attached to bonus funds
The terms should state which games count towards wagering and how much each category contributes. They should also identify when the offer expires and what must happen before funds or winnings can be withdrawn. These conditions determine whether the displayed reward can be used as intended; a headline amount alone cannot answer that.
Check the maximum permitted bet while bonus funds are active. A specialist review describes restrictions linked either to the deposit or to a fixed stake, but the applicable limit is the one stated in the operator’s current terms. Exceeding it may affect the bonus or associated winnings, so the wording needs to be clear before play begins.
Withdrawal rules deserve equal attention. Terms may set conditions for releasing winnings, specify which balance is withdrawn first, or explain what happens if the bonus is cancelled. The decisive point is the operator’s stated process: a reward that cannot be withdrawn under the expected conditions has a different practical value from one that can.
A new or recently promoted casino does not change this calculation. The name, launch status and offer label do not replace the eligibility test, qualifying deposit, contribution rules, expiry, bet limit and withdrawal conditions. A compact terms check can be more informative than a larger headline reward.
Slots, Game Contribution and Bonus Wagering
A game’s contribution rate determines how much of a qualifying stake counts towards bonus wagering. Slots commonly count the full stake: with a 100% contribution, the amount wagered on an eligible spin is counted in full. Table games, video poker and live games can count far less, with rates ranging from 0% to 20%. At the lower end, a stake may add nothing to the wagering total.
This difference affects the amount of play needed to clear a requirement. If a game contributes only a fraction of each stake, more total wagering is needed to produce the same credited progress than on a game contributing in full. A game’s contribution rate therefore matters alongside the wagering requirement itself; the headline multiple alone does not show how quickly the counter can move.
The rate applies to eligible play under the offer’s terms, not automatically to every game in a casino. A slot may be excluded, or a game category may carry a reduced rate. The offer wording should identify which games count and at what rate. If that information is unclear, the expected progress cannot be calculated reliably.
A deposit amount and a game’s contribution are separate conditions. Searches for online slots with a £10 or £15 minimum deposit concern the amount needed to open or fund an account; they do not establish how a particular game contributes to bonus wagering. Nor does a low deposit threshold show that the resulting bonus can be cleared through every slot. The account threshold, qualifying deposit and game contribution answer different questions.
Game Contribution Rates
Slots commonly have a 100% contribution, meaning stakes count in full. Table games, video poker and live games often range from 0% to 20%, meaning more total wagering is required to make progress.
The calculation is straightforward once the applicable rate is known: multiply the stake by the contribution rate to find the amount credited towards wagering. A full contribution credits the entire eligible stake; a partial contribution credits only its stated share. A zero contribution leaves the wagering counter unchanged. That distinction can make a low-contribution game costly in time and turnover, even when its individual stakes appear modest.
The practical comparison is therefore between eligible games and their stated contribution, not between labels such as slots and table games alone. Slots often receive full contribution, while table games, video poker and live games may receive only a small fraction or none. The specific terms govern the calculation. A game’s name or category is not a substitute for checking its listed rate, and a deposit figure does not fill that gap.
Mobile Deposits and the Qualifying-Deposit Clock
A £15 minimum deposit on a mobile casino page describes an amount, not a timing extension. Where a First Deposit Bonus requires a qualifying deposit, the stated condition is that it must be made within 48 hours of registration. The clock is tied to registration, not to the point when a player next opens the site or app.
That distinction matters for deposits made from a phone. Registering on mobile and depositing later still leaves the same time condition in place. A £15 payment made after the qualifying window has passed may not meet the offer’s timing requirement, even if £15 is enough to satisfy the advertised deposit threshold. The payment amount and the deadline are separate conditions.
The word “made” should not be treated as permission to assume that starting a payment is enough. Offer terms determine what counts as a qualifying deposit and how its timing is assessed. A mobile checkout screen, payment confirmation or pending transaction should not be assumed to settle that point unless the operator’s terms say so. The relevant record is the one the offer recognises, not simply the moment the deposit process begins.
SMS payment searches raise the same issue, with an additional condition: the payment method must be accepted for the offer to count. A page mentioning a £15 mobile minimum does not, by itself, establish that payment by SMS is available or that an SMS-funded deposit qualifies. Those details need to be confirmed in the live offer and payment information before registration or payment. The amount shown in a search result cannot resolve either question.
For a mobile deposit, the practical sequence is therefore narrow: note when registration is completed, identify the offer’s qualifying-deposit condition, and ensure the deposit is recognised within 48 hours. If the payment route has a separate confirmation process, its timing should not be guessed from the fact that the transaction was initiated on a phone. The terms, rather than the device, determine eligibility.
The 48-hour window is short enough to make timing part of the offer’s value. A £15 minimum can look compatible with a player’s planned deposit while the qualifying condition remains unmet because of the timing or payment route. Mobile access changes where the transaction happens; it does not change the stated deadline.
A £15 Deposit Bonus: Calculate the Wagering Before Counting the Reward
A £15 deposit does not determine the bonus amount by itself. With a Deposit Match Bonus, the percentage and any maximum award set how much bonus money is added. A specialist review describes a common structure as a 100% match up to £100, but that is an example of a reported offer format, not a term that applies to every casino. At a 100% match, a £15 deposit would produce a £15 bonus, provided the offer’s conditions allow that deposit to qualify.
Attention Wagering requirements are calculated based on the bonus amount alone, not the combined total of the deposit and the bonus.
The wagering calculation applies to the bonus component. At the current UK cap of 10 times the bonus amount, a £15 bonus would require £150 in wagering before the bonus funds meet that requirement. That figure is not the deposit plus the bonus multiplied by 10: the calculation is based on the bonus amount. The cap has applied since 19 January 2026, and an offer can set a lower requirement.
A stated cap on the match also changes the arithmetic. A specialist review describes deposit matches as often having a maximum award, with 100% up to £100 as one common illustration. Once a bonus reaches its stated maximum, depositing more does not raise the bonus. That extra deposit can increase the cash committed without increasing the reward or reducing the wagering attached to it.
The wording “£15 minimum deposit casino bonus” points to an offer with a qualifying deposit threshold; it does not establish that the bonus itself is worth £15. A “no-deposit bonus” describes a different arrangement: the label alone cannot show that a £15 deposit is required, or that a deposit is required at all. The offer’s actual terms determine which structure applies.
For a £15 deposit, the useful figures are therefore the match percentage, the maximum bonus, and the wagering multiple applied to the bonus. The headline amount is only the starting input. The final wagering total is the amount that must be completed before the bonus can count as cleared value.
PayPal and a £15 Deposit: Eligibility Still Depends on the Offer
A £15 deposit made through PayPal and a qualifying deposit for a First Deposit Bonus are separate things. The payment method records how funds are transferred; it does not, by itself, establish whether the deposit meets an offer’s conditions. A casino may display a PayPal option while the bonus has its own eligibility rules. The relevant question is not simply whether PayPal can be used, but whether the live offer treats that deposit as qualifying.
The distinction matters when the offer headline gives a reward without making the conditions equally prominent. A deposit of £15 could be accepted into an account yet fail to qualify for the advertised reward if the offer specifies a different qualifying deposit, excludes the account from eligibility or applies another condition. The payment route cannot override those terms.
The value of the offer must therefore be assessed from its actual components: the reward available, eligibility, qualifying deposit, wagering contribution, expiry and withdrawal conditions. These determine what the bonus is worth in practice. PayPal does not supply any of those figures or rules; they belong to the offer itself. Two offers associated with the same payment method may therefore produce different outcomes, while the same offer conditions remain the controlling point regardless of how the deposit is made.
A useful distinction is between payment acceptance and bonus qualification. Payment acceptance concerns whether the transaction can be used to fund the account. Bonus qualification concerns whether that deposit satisfies the live promotion’s rules. Treating the first as proof of the second turns a payment option into a promise the terms may not make.
Payment acceptance (e.g., via PayPal) only confirms that a transaction can fund an account; it does not guarantee that the deposit satisfies a bonus’s qualifying conditions.
For a £15 deposit, the practical calculation begins only after the qualifying-deposit condition and the reward terms are clear. If the offer does not include that deposit in its qualifying conditions, the presence of PayPal does not make it eligible. If it does, the remaining terms still determine the bonus’s practical value and whether its conditions suit the account. The method is one part of the transaction; eligibility is decided by the offer.
“Not on Gamstop” Is Not a Licence Check
A casino described as “not on Gamstop” is being identified by its relationship to a self-exclusion scheme, not by proof of its regulatory status. The label does not establish whether the operator holds a licence to offer gambling to customers in Great Britain. A stated £15 minimum deposit answers a separate question about the amount accepted; it says nothing about the operator’s authority.
The UK Gambling Commission regulates gambling activity, including online casinos, and is the sole regulator for commercial gambling in Great Britain. Its remit covers remote gambling offered to people in Great Britain regardless of where the operator’s key equipment is located. An overseas base therefore does not, by itself, remove the licensing question.
The Commission issues operating licences to businesses and personal licences to individuals working in the sector. For a casino serving Great Britain, the relevant check is the business’s operating licence on the Commission’s public register. A phrase on a casino page, in an advert or in a review is not a substitute for that record.
The distinction matters when a page combines “not on Gamstop” with a low deposit claim. Neither phrase verifies a licence. Nor does a search result’s use of “UK” establish that the operator is authorised for the British market. Licensing is a regulatory status, not a deposit feature or a marketing category.
The practical check is to find the operator’s legal business name and licence details, then confirm that the entry appears on the UK Gambling Commission’s register and corresponds to the casino in question. If the details cannot be matched, the “not on Gamstop” label does not resolve the uncertainty. A £15 threshold remains only a threshold; it cannot certify the operator.
Real-Money Deposits and Bonus Funds Are Not the Same Balance
A real-money deposit and a casino bonus may appear together in an account, but they do not have the same status. Deposited cash is money paid into the account. Bonus funds are conditional: accepting them can attach wagering requirements that must be met before the bonus amount can be withdrawn.
The distinction matters when assessing a £15 deposit. The deposit itself does not make an attached bonus immediately withdrawable. A displayed bonus balance is not necessarily cash available for withdrawal; its value depends on the conditions governing it. The wagering requirement sets how many times the bonus amount must be wagered before that bonus can be withdrawn.
That calculation concerns the bonus component, not simply the amount deposited. If an offer displays both a cash deposit and a bonus, treating the combined balance as one freely withdrawable sum overstates what is available. The deposit may be real money while the bonus remains subject to its own withdrawal condition.
A real-money online casino with a £15 minimum deposit therefore describes the deposit threshold, not the status of every amount credited after payment. The minimum deposit and the bonus’s wagering requirement answer different questions: one concerns the amount needed to fund the account; the other concerns when bonus funds can be withdrawn.
The practical distinction is accounting, not presentation. A balance shown on screen can include money with different conditions attached. Until the bonus wagering requirement is met, the bonus amount has not crossed from conditional value into withdrawable funds. A careful reading separates the sum paid in from the promotional amount and does not count the latter as cash merely because it appears in the same account.
Prepared by the Jeanniemarshall.com editorial staff.
