Casinos that accept WebMoney in the UK: what’s verified
Available in GBBoku details explain how pay-by-phone deposits work, but only an operator’s current cashier options or terms can establish WebMoney acceptance.
Table of Contents
- The payment evidence is about Boku, not WebMoney
- What pay-by-phone deposits actually do
- Deposit ceilings, phone balances and timing
- Casino deposits, card funding and the missing link
- Pay-by-phone deposits and welcome-bonus maths
- Slots are a separate question from the payment method
- Why pay-by-mobile options have narrowed
- When another payment route is needed
- GamStop status cannot be inferred from a payment method
The payment evidence is about Boku, not WebMoney
Boku and WebMoney are separate payment services. Information about a casino accepting Boku therefore does not establish that it accepts WebMoney, whether as an account deposit, through a WebMoney card or by another route. The distinction matters: a list of casinos using Pay by Phone cannot be treated as a list of WebMoney casinos.
Nor does a casino’s general support for cards or digital payments, by itself, show that a particular WebMoney product can be used. A payment name needs to appear among the operator’s own current cashier options or payment terms before acceptance can be treated as established.
Licensing answers a different question. In Great Britain, the UK Gambling Commission oversees commercial gambling, including remote gambling offered to consumers there. Its remit applies to an operator serving the market even when the equipment used to provide the gambling is located elsewhere. The Commission is the sole regulator for commercial gambling in Great Britain and issues operating licences to businesses, as well as personal licences to individuals working in relevant roles.
Use this list as a starting point when looking for UK casinos associated with WebMoney, and check each casino’s cashier to confirm current payment options and terms. The available information also gives a stated payout speed for each operator.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days EvoSpin has a stated payout speed of 1–3 business days. Check its cashier for current WebMoney availability and payment terms.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days Dieselwin has a stated payout speed of 1–3 business days. Check its cashier for current WebMoney availability and payment terms.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days SlotoSport has a stated payout speed of 1–3 business days. Check its cashier for current WebMoney availability and payment terms.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days x3bet has a stated payout speed of 1–3 business days. Check its cashier for current WebMoney availability and payment terms.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days Britsino has a stated payout speed of 1–3 business days. Check its cashier for current WebMoney availability and payment terms.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days WinBeast has a stated payout speed of 1–3 business days. Check its cashier for current WebMoney availability and payment terms.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days NightLuck has a stated payout speed of 1–3 business days. Check its cashier for current WebMoney availability and payment terms.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days BeOnBet has a stated payout speed of 1–3 business days. Check its cashier for current WebMoney availability and payment terms.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days Revery Play has a stated payout speed of 1–3 business days. Check its cashier for current WebMoney availability and payment terms.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days Chanze has a stated payout speed of 1–3 business days. Check its cashier for current WebMoney availability and payment terms.
That regulatory framework does not identify which payment methods a casino accepts. A UKGC licence establishes that the operator is authorised within the relevant system; it is not evidence that WebMoney appears in the cashier. Payment acceptance is an operator-level condition and must be established separately. Likewise, a reference to Boku says something about Boku, not about WebMoney or every other method available at the same casino.
The practical conclusion is narrow. UK casino payment information centred on Boku supports statements about that phone-billing service, while WebMoney acceptance requires its own confirmation. Searches for WebMoney deposits, WebMoney cards or casinos that take WebMoney do not turn details of a different payment method into proof. The names may appear in the same broad discussion of deposits, but they are not interchangeable, and one cannot be used as a substitute for the other.
What pay-by-phone deposits actually do
A Boku deposit starts in the casino cashier, where the payment method and deposit amount are selected. The player enters a mobile number, then confirms the transaction using a verification code sent by SMS. The number links the casino payment to the mobile account; it is not a WebMoney account or wallet login.
After confirmation, the deposit is billed through the mobile network. For a contract phone, the charge is added to the monthly bill. For a pay-as-you-go (PAYG) phone, it is deducted from the available prepaid credit. The casino deposit and the mobile charge are therefore connected parts of one payment: the casino receives a deposit, while the phone account carries the cost.
That route differs from entering card or e-wallet details in a cashier. The phone number and SMS confirmation authorise the Boku transaction, and the resulting charge appears through the mobile account rather than as a direct WebMoney payment. A casino offering Boku is not thereby shown to accept WebMoney, and a phone-billing option does not establish that a WebMoney card can be used.
The sequence is straightforward, but each step has a distinct role. Selecting Boku tells the cashier which payment service to use. Entering the amount states the intended deposit. Providing the phone number identifies the mobile account to be charged. The SMS code confirms the transaction. If that confirmation is not completed, the described payment flow has not been authorised.
For PAYG customers, the relevant source of funds is prepaid phone credit; for monthly-bill customers, it is the mobile account’s bill. Neither arrangement turns the mobile operator into the casino or changes the deposit into a withdrawal. Boku is used to put money into a casino account, with the charge routed through the phone service.
This distinction matters when comparing payment labels. “Pay by Phone” describes a billing route, not a general promise that every phone-based or digital payment service is accepted. WebMoney acceptance would need to be stated separately in the casino’s cashier. A deposit option should be judged by the method actually named and the steps the cashier requests, not by the fact that both methods can be used to pay online.
Boku Deposit Process
Select Boku as the payment method and enter the deposit amount in the casino cashier.
Enter your mobile phone number to link the transaction to your mobile account.
Enter the verification code sent to you via SMS to authorise the transaction.
The deposit is processed and billed through your mobile network as a monthly charge or a deduction from prepaid credit.
Deposit ceilings, phone balances and timing
Boku limits are not a single figure that applies at every casino and mobile network. A specialist review gives a UK transaction ceiling of £30, while noting that some casinos or network operators may permit £40 or £50. A separate description puts the network-level limit at £30 per day and says transactions are typically around £10, without specifying a per-transaction cap. Those accounts do not align: one sets out a transaction limit, while the other describes a daily ceiling and leaves the transaction maximum open. Neither should be treated as a universal tariff.
The distinction matters when estimating how much can be deposited. A casino cashier may show an amount that the payment service or mobile operator will not authorise. Conversely, a higher figure reported for one operator does not establish that the same limit applies across other casinos or networks. The available figures describe different layers of the transaction, and the daily limit is attributed to the mobile operator rather than the casino. A casino’s own deposit controls and the network’s payment controls should therefore be read as separate conditions, not combined into one headline maximum.
Some specialist payment material also describes Boku deposits as available only in amounts divisible by ten, listing £10, £20 and £30 as examples. That is a reported transaction-format restriction, not proof that every casino currently offers those exact selections. It also does not settle the maximum: a permitted increment and a transaction ceiling answer different questions. A displayed amount can meet the increment rule yet still exceed a network limit or the account’s available balance.
For a pay-as-you-go customer, the remaining mobile credit is another independent constraint. A Boku deposit cannot exceed that balance; if the available credit is insufficient, the requested amount cannot be funded from it. This can make the practical ceiling lower than the casino’s stated maximum. For example, a £30 casino limit does not make £30 available to a PAYG user whose remaining credit is below that sum. The phone balance is not an extra allowance on top of the network limit: it is a separate condition that may reduce the amount that can actually be charged.
Monthly-bill customers face a different accounting route because the Boku charge is added to the mobile bill rather than deducted from prepaid credit. That changes where the cost appears, but it does not establish that a casino or network will accept any particular deposit amount. The relevant figure still depends on the limits applied to the transaction and by the mobile operator. A bill payment can feel less immediate than spending visible prepaid credit; the charge is still a gambling deposit, not money outside the payment controls.
Timing needs the same separation between processing and availability. Boku’s payment description says deposits are generally credited almost instantly after processing, but that is not a promise that every attempted payment will complete at the same speed. The payment still has to be accepted through the relevant route. An amount within a casino’s limit may be rejected if it exceeds the mobile operator’s allowance or, on PAYG, the remaining phone balance. Fast crediting after approval does not remove those checks.
Boku Deposit Constraints
The actual amount that can be deposited is the lowest of three constraints: the casino’s limit, the mobile network’s authorisation limit, and the available prepaid phone balance (for PAYG users).
The practical calculation is therefore the lowest applicable constraint: the amount the casino allows, the amount the mobile network will authorise, and—where the phone uses prepaid credit—the balance available to spend. The sources disagree on how to express Boku’s ceilings, so a single fixed figure would conceal rather than resolve that uncertainty. A listed maximum should be treated as conditional on the specific cashier and mobile account, not as a market-wide promise.
These figures concern Boku, a Pay by Phone route. They do not establish deposit limits, balance rules or processing times for WebMoney. A casino accepting one payment method cannot be assumed to accept another, and a Boku ceiling cannot be transferred to a WebMoney deposit. The useful comparison is between the conditions attached to the actual option in the cashier and the funds available through that route; the numbers above are not a WebMoney tariff.
Casino deposits, card funding and the missing link
A WebMoney-branded card and a casino’s WebMoney payment option are not the same thing. A card may provide a way to spend a balance, but that does not establish that a casino cashier accepts WebMoney, or that it accepts a particular WebMoney card. The payment method shown at the cashier is the relevant test; a card’s name alone cannot confirm compatibility.
The same distinction applies to debit cards. A casino may accept debit-card deposits without accepting WebMoney, while a WebMoney card should not be assumed to work simply because it carries a payment-card logo. These are separate routes, with separate processing arrangements. Acceptance of one does not demonstrate acceptance of the other.
Credit cards are different again. UK-licensed casinos cannot accept credit-card payments for gambling, including credit-card funds routed through a money service business. A wallet also cannot be used where it allows credit-card funds to be spent on gambling. That restriction does not turn a debit card into a WebMoney payment method, nor does the presence of a card-funded wallet prove that the casino supports WebMoney.
One reported alternative route is to fund Neteller using Boku and then deposit with a casino that accepts Neteller. A specialist review describes that route; it is not evidence that a casino accepts WebMoney directly, or that a WebMoney card can fund Neteller. Each step depends on the relevant service accepting the payment, so the route should not be treated as interchangeable with a WebMoney deposit.
The distinction matters when comparing payment options. “WebMoney accepted” would mean the casino’s cashier offers that method for the account in question. “WebMoney card accepted” would need to mean the card itself can be used through a supported card route. Neither follows from the other, and neither follows from a casino accepting debit cards or Neteller.
For British players, payment compatibility sits within the operator’s licensing obligations. Remote gambling operators serving Great Britain must hold the relevant UK Gambling Commission licence. The licence status and the cashier’s listed methods answer different questions: one concerns the operator’s authority to serve the market, the other concerns how a deposit can be made.
Credit Card Ban
UK-licensed casinos are prohibited from accepting credit-card payments for gambling, including funds routed through money service businesses or wallets.
A practical comparison therefore needs to keep the payment labels separate: WebMoney balance, WebMoney-branded card, ordinary debit card, Neteller and Boku are not synonyms. A confirmed route from Boku through Neteller is a Neteller route at the casino stage. It should not be presented as direct WebMoney acceptance.
Pay-by-phone deposits and welcome-bonus maths
A deposit method and a welcome offer are separate parts of the account terms. A casino may accept Pay by Phone deposits without counting them towards a bonus, while another may allow a qualifying deposit to trigger an offer. Eligibility therefore has to be established for the specific payment route, not inferred from the presence of a welcome banner.
A specialist review identifies MrQ, Duelz, Mr Vegas and Videoslots as operators where pay-by-phone deposits qualify for bonus eligibility. That is a time-sensitive snapshot, not a permanent rule for every account or offer. The applicable terms can differ between operators and can also change when an offer changes. A deposit being accepted into the casino account does not, by itself, establish that it qualifies for a bonus.
The distinction matters because the value of a match depends on more than the headline percentage. A specialist review describes a typical UK welcome offer as a 100% deposit match up to £100, with a 35x wagering requirement. On the stated terms, a qualifying deposit can be matched pound for pound until the cap is reached. The cap limits the bonus, not necessarily the amount that can be deposited; the payment method’s own deposit conditions remain separate.
The wagering calculation then determines how much play is required before bonus-related funds can be withdrawn. The phrase “35x wagering requirement” is incomplete unless the terms specify what is multiplied: the bonus, the deposit, or the combined amount. Those bases produce different totals. A matched offer can therefore look identical at the point of deposit while imposing a different turnover obligation. The headline match is not the final cash value.
For a £100 match, the bonus reaches its stated cap, but the wagering base still needs to be identified in the offer terms. If the multiplier applies to the bonus alone, the calculation starts from the bonus amount; if it applies to the deposit and bonus together, it starts from a larger balance. The exact wording controls the amount of qualifying play required.
Pay-by-phone eligibility should also be checked before a deposit is made, because a payment can be accepted while remaining outside the welcome offer. The conditions may specify which payment methods qualify, whether the offer must be activated, and how the wagering requirement is counted. These are distinct questions: payment acceptance concerns adding funds, bonus eligibility concerns whether the deposit triggers the offer, and wagering concerns what must happen before bonus-linked funds become withdrawable.
- Check if the specific payment route is bonus-eligible
- Identify the exact wagering base in the terms
- Verify the expiry deadline for bonus funds and spins
- Assume a welcome banner applies to all payment methods
- Rely on the headline match percentage alone
- Assume bonus spins share the same expiry as bonus funds
Expiry adds a deadline to that calculation. A specialist review reports bonus funds expiring within 30 days and bonus spins within 72 hours. Those periods should be treated as terms from a particular review, not as universal deadlines across UK casinos. The offer itself sets the relevant expiry conditions. Where a bonus expires before its wagering requirement is completed, the uncompleted bonus value may no longer be available; the practical cost is the value lost, not merely an unused promotional label.
Bonus spins have a separate clock from bonus funds. A short expiry can make their nominal value difficult to realise if play is not completed in time, while a longer bonus-funds period does not automatically extend the spins. The two conditions should be read independently. Any limits on eligible games or contribution rates also affect the amount of qualifying wagering credited, so a stated multiplier alone does not provide the whole calculation.
There is no sound basis for treating a WebMoney deposit as bonus-eligible merely because a casino advertises a welcome offer or accepts another payment method. The same applies in reverse: a Pay by Phone eligibility statement does not establish WebMoney eligibility. Payment route, offer qualification, wagering basis and expiry are separate contractual inputs. A useful comparison records each one before assigning a cash value to the promotion.
The final figure is therefore not the advertised match. It is the amount of bonus actually awarded after the payment method qualifies, reduced by any expiry or game restrictions, and considered against the precise wagering base and multiplier. If any one of those terms is unclear, the offer cannot be priced accurately from its headline alone. Promotional arithmetic is only as reliable as its smallest condition.
Slots are a separate question from the payment method
A casino’s payment options and its slot catalogue are separate parts of the service. A WebMoney option in a cashier would indicate a possible way to fund an account; it would not identify which games are available, whether those games work on mobile, or whether a particular slot can be played with a given balance. The reverse is also true: a casino offering a broad range of slots does not thereby establish that it accepts WebMoney deposits.
That distinction matters when comparing casinos by games, bonuses or mobile access. A bonus condition concerns the deposit and the promotion; a game listing concerns the titles available to play. Neither answers the other question. Any claim about WebMoney acceptance, deposit charges or a WebMoney-specific offer needs to be checked separately against the casino’s current cashier and terms. A slot catalogue is not payment evidence.
Mobile access is another independent detail. A casino site may be usable on a phone, but that does not establish that a particular payment method is supported on mobile, or that every listed game is available in the same way across devices. The payment method, device compatibility and game availability are distinct conditions, not interchangeable signs of support.
In Great Britain, online slots also operate under rules that apply regardless of how an account is funded. Online slot autoplay is banned, and each spin must last at least 2.5 seconds. The maximum stake per game cycle is £5 for adults. These limits concern play itself; they do not confirm which titles a casino carries or which deposit methods its cashier accepts.
The regulatory boundary is equally separate. Remote gambling operators serving consumers in Great Britain must hold the relevant UK Gambling Commission licence, regardless of where their equipment is located. The Commission licenses businesses to provide gambling services and regulates the activity. A casino’s payment branding, game selection or mobile layout does not substitute for that licence status.
A useful comparison therefore keeps three checks apart: whether the operator is licensed for the British market, which games it actually offers, and which payment methods its cashier currently accepts. Bonus terms form a further check, since a promotion can impose conditions on qualifying deposits without changing the slot catalogue. Bundling these into a single label such as “best games” obscures what is being compared.
For slot play, the relevant terms are the game rules, stake controls and any promotion conditions attached to the account. For payment, the relevant terms are the cashier’s available methods and their restrictions. One does not prove the other. A WebMoney casino description should not be treated as a guarantee of a particular slot selection, mobile compatibility, fee structure or bonus eligibility; each is a separate operator-level condition.
Why pay-by-mobile options have narrowed
The retreat from Boku has been gradual rather than the result of a named UK-wide prohibition. The UK Gambling Commission did not introduce a rule banning Boku specifically. Instead, individual casino operators stopped offering it because they considered the associated compliance risk too high. That distinction matters: a payment option can disappear from a cashier even when no regulator has ordered every casino to remove it.
A specialist casino-payment review describes the available Boku list as having contracted since 2023, leaving only a small number of UKGC-licensed casinos still reported to accept it. That is a changing operator-level picture, not a permanent directory. A name appearing on an older list does not establish that Boku remains available in its cashier now.
The replacement has not been uniform. Some operators have shifted to other Pay by Phone services, including Fonix or Siru Mobile; others have removed mobile payments altogether. The same specialist review identifies MrQ and Duelz with Fonix, and Mr Vegas and Videoslots with Siru Mobile. These examples illustrate the direction of change, but payment menus can change, so the relevant option is the one displayed by the operator at the time of registration or deposit.
This fragmentation makes “mobile payment accepted” an imprecise description. Boku, Fonix and Siru Mobile are distinct services; a casino offering one does not thereby offer the others. Nor does an operator’s past use of Boku establish its current cashier options. The practical consequence is that a search for a particular payment brand cannot be answered reliably by a general label such as Pay by Phone.
A Pay by Phone service reported to be used by operators such as MrQ and Duelz.
A Pay by Phone service reported to be used by operators such as Mr Vegas and Videoslots.
A mobile payment route that has seen a contraction in availability among UKGC-licensed casinos since 2023.
Compliance risk is the stated operator-level reason for dropping Boku, but that does not mean every operator made the same assessment or changed at the same time. Some retained a direct Boku route, some adopted a different mobile-payment provider, and some discontinued the category. There is no single industry-wide migration path.
For payment comparisons, the useful distinction is therefore between a named service and the broader channel. A casino may still process phone-account deposits through a replacement provider while no longer accepting Boku itself. Conversely, a site that once supported Boku may now offer no Pay by Phone option. The direction of travel is clear in the reported reviews; the status of any individual cashier still needs to be treated as time-sensitive.
When another payment route is needed
A deposit method and a withdrawal method perform different jobs. Boku can be used to put money into a casino account, but it cannot receive casino winnings. A successful deposit therefore does not establish that the same route can be used when money is paid out.
That distinction matters when comparing payment options, including WebMoney and possible alternatives. A method appearing in a cashier’s deposit menu is not evidence that it supports withdrawals, and a casino’s general payment information may not show which routes are available to a particular account. The relevant terms are the operator’s current cashier options and withdrawal rules—not the payment brand alone.
A deposit route is not a complete payment plan
For a Pay by Phone deposit through Boku, the payment is charged to the mobile account or deducted from available prepaid credit. The transaction moves money into the gambling balance; it does not create a route back to the phone account. Any winnings remain subject to the casino’s withdrawal process.
The practical consequence is that a player depositing with Boku must register another withdrawal method. This is a separate step, not an optional feature of Boku. Without a registered route the casino can use for payouts, the deposit method alone does not complete the payment arrangement.
The alternatives can include a debit card, an e-wallet or a bank transfer, but those are categories of payment route, not a promise that every casino accepts each one. Nor does naming an option establish compatibility with WebMoney. Availability depends on the operator and the account, so each route has to be checked in the casino’s own cashier and withdrawal conditions before funds are deposited.
Check the route in both directions
Payment menus can make two different questions look like one: what can fund the account, and what can receive a payout? They should be assessed separately. A route shown beside deposit options may not be available for withdrawals; conversely, a payout route may require account registration or verification before it can be used.
The same caution applies to WebMoney. A casino described as accepting WebMoney would still need to specify whether that means deposits, withdrawals or both. Without that distinction, “accepted” is incomplete information for working out how money can leave the account. No debit-card, e-wallet or bank-transfer option should be treated as a verified WebMoney-compatible route merely because it is available at the same casino.
Payment Plan Verification
- Confirm the method is available for deposits
- Identify which withdrawal methods the casino accepts
- Check if a separate withdrawal method must be registered
- Verify the route is permitted under the casino’s payment rules
- Check the operator’s licence on the UKGC public register
Payment arrangements also sit within the operator’s regulatory obligations. Remote gambling businesses serving consumers in Great Britain must hold the relevant UK Gambling Commission licence. The licence concerns the operator’s authority to offer gambling; it does not certify that a particular payment method works for both deposits and withdrawals. The licence number should be checked on the Commission’s public register before money is deposited.
A UK-licensed casino cannot accept credit cards for gambling. A debit-card option should not be confused with a credit-card route, and a payment intermediary does not make credit-card-funded gambling permissible. E-wallets also cannot be used where they allow credit-card funds to be spent on gambling. These restrictions are relevant when selecting a payout route as well as when considering how an account is funded: the payment method must be permitted for the transaction in question.
What to establish before depositing
The account’s payment plan is complete only when both sides are clear:
- whether the chosen method is available for deposits;
- which withdrawal methods the casino accepts;
- whether a separate method must be registered before a payout;
- whether the selected route is permitted under the casino’s payment rules.
Those checks do not identify a universal best alternative to WebMoney. The usable option depends on the operator’s current terms and the player’s account, and the listed categories are not evidence of support at any particular casino. Where Boku is used, the need for another withdrawal method is explicit: winnings cannot be returned through Boku. For other deposit routes, the cashier and withdrawal conditions must establish the position independently.
This is a functional distinction, not a matter of convenience. A deposit option answers how funds enter the account; the withdrawal rules answer how they can leave. Treating those as interchangeable can leave a player with a funded balance but no registered payout route. A verified licence and a visible payment logo do not remove the need to check the withdrawal conditions themselves.
GamStop status cannot be inferred from a payment method
A casino’s payment options and its GamStop status are separate matters. Accepting WebMoney would describe how an account can be funded; it would not show whether the operator participates in GamStop. The same applies in reverse: a casino’s relationship with the self-exclusion scheme cannot be established from a list of deposit methods.
GamStop is a self-exclusion scheme, not a payment service. Its status should therefore be assessed independently of whether a casino offers WebMoney, cards or another way to deposit. A payment label is not evidence of an operator’s licensing position or its connection to an exclusion scheme.
For gambling offered to customers in Great Britain, remote operators must hold the relevant UK Gambling Commission licence. The Commission regulates commercial gambling in Great Britain and issues operating licences to businesses. A licence and GamStop participation are distinct checks: neither can be inferred from the cashier, and neither is a substitute for the other.
This matters when comparing claims about WebMoney casinos described as “not on GamStop” or “without GamStop”. Those phrases do not establish that WebMoney is accepted, that the operator is licensed for the British market, or that the casino is outside the scheme. They combine separate questions into one label, which is convenient for a listing and unhelpful for assessing the account.
A casino’s current licence can be checked on the UK Gambling Commission’s public register before money is deposited. The operator’s GamStop position must be checked separately through reliable information about the scheme and the operator. No conclusion about one follows from the other.
“WebMoney casino” identifies a claimed payment route; “GamStop casino” describes a different status. Treating either phrase as proof of the other risks choosing a site on an assumption rather than on the terms that actually govern it.
What are the deposit limits at pay-by-mobile casinos?
Boku is commonly limited to £30 per transaction, with a network-level daily limit of £30 reported. Some casinos or mobile networks may allow £40 or £50, while PAYG deposits are also capped by the phone credit available.
Why are UK casinos dropping Boku?
Individual operators have dropped Boku because of compliance risk; the UK Gambling Commission did not introduce a specific ban on the service. Since 2023, some casinos have switched to Fonix or Siru Mobile, while others have removed pay-by-mobile payments.
What is the standard Boku deposit limit in the UK?
The standard limit is £30 per transaction, though some casinos or mobile networks may allow up to £40 or £50. Network-level daily limits are reported at £30.
Are Boku deposits eligible for casino bonuses?
Bonus eligibility varies by operator. MrQ, Duelz, Mr Vegas and Videoslots are confirmed to accept pay-by-phone deposits for bonus eligibility, but Boku deposits generally do not come with specific bonuses.
Prepared by the Jeanniemarshall.com editorial staff.
