Online Casinos That Accept SMS Deposits: Boku Guide
Available in GBThe guide explains the cashier-to-phone authorisation process and the separate rules for bonuses, withdrawals and mobile billing.
Table of Contents
- How a Boku Deposit Reaches the Casino
- What “Accepting SMS Deposits” Means in the UK
- Boku, Fonix and Other Pay-by-Mobile Options
- Why the Available Casino Choices Keep Changing
- Where the Deposit Appears on a Phone Account
- Network Support and PAYG Balance Constraints
- Bonus Eligibility Is a Separate Calculation
- Deposit Limits Set by the Casino and the Network
- Withdrawals and Other Ways to Fund an Account
- SMS Deposits, Slot Bonuses and Spin Conditions
How a Boku Deposit Reaches the Casino
A Boku deposit starts in the casino cashier, not in the phone’s messaging app. The player signs in, opens the deposit section and selects Boku from the payment methods shown. If it is available for that account, the cashier then asks for a deposit amount and the mobile number to be used for confirmation. The transaction is authorised through a text message before the casino receives the payment instruction.
The steps are simple, but each field has a distinct job. The amount tells the cashier how much to request. The phone number identifies the mobile account that will be asked to approve the charge. The SMS code confirms that the person completing the deposit can access that phone. Entering a number alone does not complete the payment; the verification step is part of the authorisation.
Entering the amount and number
After choosing Boku, the cashier displays the amount options or an amount field. A specialist review describes Boku deposits as available only in amounts divisible by ten, giving £10, £20 and £30 as examples. That description should not be treated as a universal rule for every cashier: the amounts shown during the transaction are the practical options presented by the casino.
The mobile number must be entered in the format requested by the payment screen. A mistyped digit can send the confirmation request to the wrong number or prevent the process from continuing. The number should therefore be checked before submitting the request. Where the cashier asks for a country code or displays one automatically, the number must match that format rather than include a duplicate code.
Submitting the amount and number prompts the SMS verification stage. The message contains a code or confirmation instruction associated with the pending transaction. The player enters the code in the cashier, or follows the stated confirmation step, to approve the request. The code is not a second deposit amount; it is evidence that the phone linked to the transaction is available to the person making it.
The sequence can be summarised as:
- Open the casino cashier and choose Boku.
- Select or enter the requested deposit amount.
- Enter the mobile number.
- Receive the SMS and complete the verification step.
- Wait for the cashier to show whether the deposit was accepted.
The final screen matters. A submitted form is not the same as a confirmed deposit. If the cashier reports that the transaction failed or remains pending, the account balance should not be treated as funded unless the casino confirms the credit. Repeating the request immediately can create uncertainty about whether there is one pending transaction or more than one, so the status displayed by the cashier is the relevant record.
Boku is designed to let the mobile account holder approve a payment without entering card or bank details into the casino cashier. That changes the authorisation route, not the basic requirement to use the casino’s deposit screen. The payment still begins with a casino account and a specified deposit amount, and the SMS step links the request to the phone number entered.
A successful confirmation does not by itself explain how the charge will later be collected. That depends on the mobile account arrangement and is separate from the cashier’s authorisation sequence. Likewise, the fact that a deposit option appears does not establish which limits apply to that account. Those are distinct terms from the process of submitting and confirming a payment.
What the SMS confirmation does
The SMS code is a transaction check, not a casino login code or a general permission for future deposits. It applies to the request then being processed. The cashier may require another confirmation if a separate deposit is started. Each attempt should be read against the details shown on screen: amount, phone number and transaction status.
If no message arrives, the transaction has not been confirmed through the described SMS step. The cause may be an incorrect number, a delay in message delivery or a problem with the payment request; the screen’s status is more informative than assuming the deposit went through. A code that arrives after the cashier has cancelled or timed out should not be entered into a different request.
Attention: If no SMS message arrives, the transaction has not been confirmed; do not assume the deposit went through despite any pending status.
This is why the procedure is best understood as a short chain of authorisations: the casino records the intended deposit, Boku sends a confirmation request to the mobile number, and the player approves that request using the received code. The casino cashier then reports the result. The process does not make Boku a withdrawal route, nor does it determine how a casino treats a deposit for bonuses.
The account itself remains subject to the rules applying to remote gambling in Great Britain. The Gambling Commission regulates remote gambling offered to consumers there, including where an operator’s key equipment is located elsewhere. It issues operating licences to businesses and personal licences to individuals, and it is the sole regulator for commercial gambling in Great Britain. A payment option in a cashier does not replace the operator’s licence requirements; licence status is a separate matter from the mechanics of confirming a deposit.
What “Accepting SMS Deposits” Means in the UK
SMS deposit availability can vary, so check the payment options and terms before choosing a casino. The details below provide the payout-speed information available for each listing.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days EvoSpin’s listed payout speed is 1–3 business days. No details are provided here about SMS deposits.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days Dieselwin’s listed payout speed is 1–3 business days. No details are provided here about SMS deposits.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days SlotoSport’s listed payout speed is 1–3 business days. No details are provided here about SMS deposits.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days x3bet’s listed payout speed is 1–3 business days. No details are provided here about SMS deposits.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days Britsino’s listed payout speed is 1–3 business days. No details are provided here about SMS deposits.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days WinBeast’s listed payout speed is 1–3 business days. No details are provided here about SMS deposits.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days NightLuck’s listed payout speed is 1–3 business days. No details are provided here about SMS deposits.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days BeOnBet’s listed payout speed is 1–3 business days. No details are provided here about SMS deposits.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days Revery Play’s listed payout speed is 1–3 business days. No details are provided here about SMS deposits.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days Chanze’s listed payout speed is 1–3 business days. No details are provided here about SMS deposits.
“SMS deposit” is commonly used as shorthand for paying for a casino deposit through a mobile phone account. In this context, the name most often attached to the service is Boku: the player authorises a payment by text, and the charge is handled through the mobile operator rather than a card payment. The phrase describes the payment route, not a separate kind of casino or a special gambling product.
That distinction matters because a casino can accept deposits by phone without offering Boku specifically. “Pay by Phone” is the more useful description of the broader payment category; Boku is one service within it. A cashier listing Pay by Phone, Boku or another provider may therefore indicate different arrangements. The provider shown at the point of payment is what identifies the method available on that account.
For anyone comparing online casinos that accept SMS deposits, the practical question is whether Boku is actually listed in the casino’s cashier. General references to phone payments are not enough to establish that it is supported. Payment methods can differ between operators, and an option that appears at one casino does not imply that another uses the same service.
Why the phrase can be misleading
The wording can make the method sound as though a text message itself transfers money to the casino. It does not. The text is part of the authorisation process; Boku handles the payment as a charge associated with the mobile account. In ordinary use, “SMS deposit” is a convenient label for that process, but it can blur the difference between the confirmation message and the underlying billing service.
This is also why “casinos that accept pay by SMS” is not a precise operator category. A casino may describe the option as Boku, Pay by Phone or mobile billing. The payment service, rather than the wording used in a general description, determines how the deposit is processed. Where the cashier does not show Boku, the casino should not be treated as a Boku-enabled site merely because it accepts another phone-based method.
The terms are particularly easy to confuse when an operator supports a mobile payment service under a different name. A phone-based deposit route and direct Boku support are related, but they are not interchangeable claims. The distinction is material when the intended method is specifically Boku rather than any payment that uses a mobile account.
A casino may describe its phone payment option as Boku, Pay by Phone, or mobile billing, but the specific provider determines how the deposit is processed.
Availability among UK-licensed casinos
Only a small number of casinos holding a UK Gambling Commission licence still accept Boku deposits. The group has contracted since 2023, so older references to casinos that once offered Boku do not establish that the option remains available now. A payment method can be removed from a cashier even while the casino itself continues to operate.
The UK Gambling Commission regulates remote gambling offered to consumers in Great Britain. Operators serving that market must hold the relevant licence, regardless of where their key equipment is located. The Commission issues operating licences to businesses; it does not provide a general approval of each payment method used by a licensee.
That regulatory role explains an important distinction. The Commission did not introduce a rule naming Boku and prohibiting its use at casinos. Individual operators discontinued it because they considered the method to carry compliance risk. The decision belongs to each operator’s payment and compliance arrangements, rather than to a Boku-specific ban imposed by the regulator.
A casino’s licence status and its cashier options are therefore separate checks. A UKGC licence establishes that the operator is authorised to offer remote gambling in Great Britain; it does not guarantee that Boku, or any particular payment method, will be available. Equally, the disappearance of Boku from a cashier does not by itself mean that the operator has lost its licence.
For a deposit decision, the relevant position is the live cashier at the licensed casino, not an old description of its payment options. The remaining Boku-accepting casinos form a small and changing part of the UK market. Treating “SMS deposits” as a promise of broad availability would overstate what the phrase can establish: it identifies a type of payment route, while actual access depends on the operator’s current support for Boku.
Boku, Fonix and Other Pay-by-Mobile Options
“Pay by Phone” describes a way to fund an account, not a single payment service. Boku, Fonix and Siru Mobile are separate providers, and an operator’s decision to accept one does not establish that it accepts the others. A casino may offer a phone-based payment route under a different provider name, retain Boku, or remove Pay by Phone altogether.
That distinction matters when looking for an SMS deposit casino. A reference to mobile payments does not confirm that Boku is available, and a casino that once accepted Boku may now show a different service in its cashier. The provider is one part of the arrangement; the operator’s current payment options determine whether the deposit can actually be made.
A specialist review’s account of the market describes operators moving away from Boku since 2023. The changes it identifies include adopting Fonix or Siru Mobile and, in some cases, removing Pay by Phone options entirely. This is a report of a market shift, not a guarantee that a named operator still offers a particular method. Cashier options can change, so the provider shown by the casino is the relevant detail when checking availability.
Similar function, different provider
Boku, Fonix and Siru Mobile can all appear in the broader category of Pay by Phone payments, but their names are not interchangeable. A casino’s support for Fonix does not mean it processes deposits through Boku; nor does a listing for Siru Mobile confirm either of the other services. The practical comparison is therefore between the service named in the cashier and the payment methods the operator makes available, rather than between generic descriptions such as “mobile deposit” and “SMS payment”.
One of the primary mobile payment services, though its availability among UK-licensed casinos has contracted since 2023.
An alternative Pay by Phone provider accepted by operators such as MrQ and Duelz.
Another mobile payment service used by operators including Mr Vegas and Videoslots.
The terminology can make this harder to assess. A description may say “SMS deposit” because a phone is involved, while the actual payment service is Fonix or Siru Mobile. Conversely, a page mentioning Boku may describe an older arrangement. For a casino SMS deposit, the provider name is more informative than the broad label: it identifies which payment route the operator is referring to.
Examples reported in a specialist review illustrate the separation. MrQ and Duelz are identified as accepting Fonix, while Mr Vegas and Videoslots are identified as accepting Siru Mobile. Those examples show that operators can use alternatives to Boku; they should not be read as a current, universal directory. The payment option attached to any individual account remains a matter for that operator’s cashier.
This is not merely a change of branding. When an operator replaces Boku with another service, a player looking specifically for Boku may no longer find the expected option, even if a different Pay by Phone method remains. Where the operator removes mobile payments altogether, there is no equivalent phone-based route in the cashier to select. A general claim that a casino accepts SMS deposits can therefore conceal a meaningful difference in the service offered—or whether the method is available at all.
What an operator’s choice tells you
The presence of Fonix or Siru Mobile indicates that the operator has chosen a different payment provider for its Pay by Phone option. It does not prove that Boku is supported behind the scenes, and it does not make the services interchangeable for a customer trying to use a particular method. The same applies in reverse: a Boku reference should not be treated as confirmation that Fonix or Siru Mobile is available.
For a UK SMS deposit casino, the useful distinction is between three outcomes: direct Boku support, an alternative phone-payment service, or no Pay by Phone option. These are separate cashier states, not different descriptions of one guaranteed service. A site may also describe its payment options broadly on an information page, while the available methods are shown more specifically at the point of deposit.
The reported movement away from Boku also explains why older mentions can mislead. A page may continue to associate an operator with Boku after its payment arrangements have changed. Equally, an operator may have adopted an alternative without presenting that change as a headline feature. For that reason, historic references establish neither present Boku support nor present Pay by Phone availability.
The narrow conclusion is that “SMS deposit” names a broad payment category, while Boku, Fonix and Siru Mobile identify distinct services within it. A replacement can preserve a phone-based funding option without preserving Boku itself; removing mobile payments leaves no such option. The provider named by the operator is the detail that separates those outcomes.
Why the Available Casino Choices Keep Changing
The number of UK-licensed casinos accepting direct Boku deposits has been shrinking since 2023. That makes availability a moving feature of an operator’s cashier, not a dependable category that can be assumed to remain unchanged. A casino that accepted Boku in an earlier review may no longer offer it, while another may present a different Pay by Phone service instead.
Note: A casino’s UKGC licence establishes regulatory status but does not guarantee that Boku or any specific payment method is currently available in the cashier.
A specialist review describes operators moving away from Boku towards Fonix or Siru Mobile, with some removing Pay by Phone altogether. That account should be read as a description of change, not as a permanent map of every casino’s payment options. Services can be replaced or withdrawn, and an old list may preserve a payment method that is no longer available at the operator.
This matters when comparing casinos described as accepting SMS deposits. The label can refer to direct Boku support, or to a broader phone-payment option that uses another provider. Those are not interchangeable cashier choices: a change of provider means the payment route has changed, even if a site still accepts payment through a mobile phone. A listing that groups all such methods under one label can therefore make availability look broader and more stable than it is.
There is also a difference between a casino being UKGC-licensed and accepting a particular payment service. The licence establishes the operator’s regulatory status; it does not guarantee that Boku will appear among its deposit methods. Payment availability is determined at operator level and can change independently. For a deposit decision, the cashier’s current options matter more than a general description of the casino.
The phrase “best casino sites that accept Pay by SMS” can imply a settled field from which operators can be ranked. That implication is weak when direct Boku support is becoming less common and replacement services differ by operator. A ranking based on an earlier snapshot could be inaccurate before it is used. A more useful comparison separates casinos with direct Boku from those offering another Pay by Phone service, then treats the displayed method as something to confirm at the point of deposit.
The practical market picture is therefore narrow and changeable: a small number of UKGC-licensed casinos still accept Boku, but the set has contracted, while other operators have switched to Fonix or Siru Mobile or removed phone payments. This does not mean that every operator has followed the same route, or that a replacement service will be available wherever Boku has disappeared. It means that “SMS deposit” is not a fixed promise about a casino’s cashier. The payment method itself needs to be identified, and its availability treated as specific to that operator and point in time.
Where the Deposit Appears on a Phone Account
A Boku casino deposit is collected through the mobile account, rather than as a separate charge to a debit card or bank account. With a monthly contract, the amount is added to the mobile phone bill. With Pay As You Go (PAYG), it is taken from the prepaid credit balance. In both cases, the casino payment becomes a phone-account charge.
That distinction matters when reviewing the cost of an SMS billing casino deposit. A contract customer sees the amount included in mobile charges; a PAYG customer loses credit that was already available for calls, texts or other services. The payment route changes how the charge is collected, not what the deposit funds: the money is credited to the casino account.
Boku therefore links the casino transaction to the mobile operator’s billing relationship. It is not a conventional bank transfer, and the charge does not become a casino withdrawal or a credit to the phone account. It is a payment for the casino deposit, collected through the mobile service.
How charges are collected
For customers on a monthly contract, the deposit amount is added to the mobile phone bill. For Pay As You Go (PAYG) users, the amount is deducted from the prepaid credit balance.
For PAYG accounts, the balance is a practical constraint. A specialist review describes Boku deposits as unable to exceed the remaining prepaid credit. If the available balance is insufficient for the chosen deposit, the transaction cannot be covered from that account. The exact balance can also change as the phone is used, so the amount shown before a deposit may not remain available afterwards.
This is the useful accounting difference between contract billing and prepaid billing: one places the charge on a bill for later payment, while the other reduces existing credit. Neither method removes the need to account for the mobile cost alongside the casino balance. A deposit credited to the casino is not free merely because no card details were entered.
The phrase “SMS billing” can obscure that distinction. The SMS is part of the payment authorisation, while the resulting charge is handled through the mobile account. For a monthly contract, it is a billed mobile charge; for PAYG, it is a deduction from prepaid credit. In either case, the phone account is where the payment is collected.
Network Support and PAYG Balance Constraints
EE, O2, Vodafone and Three support Pay by Phone services, including Fonix. That establishes network-level support for mobile payments; it does not mean every casino offers every service on all four networks. The payment option still has to be available through the casino and compatible with the mobile account being used. A phone on a supported network is therefore necessary for some payment routes, but it does not by itself confirm that a particular deposit will be accepted.
PAYG accounts add a balance constraint to Boku payments. The transaction is taken from the available prepaid credit, so the usable amount cannot exceed the credit left on the phone. If the balance is insufficient, the payment may be declined. A specialist payment review also describes the remaining balance as a cap on the deposit; this should be treated as a reported condition rather than a universal limit applying identically to every operator and account.
That distinction matters when assessing a mobile casino deposit by SMS. Network support concerns whether a service can operate through the mobile provider; the PAYG balance concerns whether the account has enough credit to cover the charge. Neither establishes that a casino accepts Boku, or that an individual account is eligible for that payment method. Those are separate checks.
Pay by Phone availability across the major networks can make more than one mobile-payment service technically possible, but the names are not interchangeable. Boku and Fonix are distinct services, and support for one does not prove support for the other at a given casino. For PAYG users, the available balance remains a practical ceiling where Boku deducts the payment from prepaid credit. A monthly-billed account does not have that same prepaid-credit calculation, although service availability still depends on the operator and network.
The practical result is narrow: network coverage identifies where supported services may work; it does not guarantee a successful casino payment. For a PAYG account, remaining credit can determine whether a Boku charge can be completed at all.
Bonus Eligibility Is a Separate Calculation
A Pay by Phone option in the cashier does not establish that a deposit qualifies for a welcome offer. Payment acceptance and bonus eligibility are separate operator decisions: one concerns whether funds can be added, the other concerns whether that deposit meets the promotion’s conditions.
Payment acceptance and bonus eligibility are separate decisions; a deposit method may be accepted for funding but excluded from a specific promotion’s terms.
The terms should be checked before depositing. An offer may exclude phone-funded deposits, or require a particular payment method; if the deposit does not qualify, the advertised bonus is not part of the account balance calculation. The relevant wording is the promotion’s payment-method rule, not simply the list of methods shown in the cashier.
Eligibility is not uniform across operators. A specialist review identifies MrQ, Duelz, Mr Vegas and Videoslots as accepting Pay by Phone deposits for bonus eligibility. That is a reported operator-specific position, not a rule that applies across the UK market, and terms can change. The promotion’s current conditions remain the deciding document.
Boku-specific offers are a different question from whether a Boku deposit is permitted. A specialist review reports no dedicated Boku deposit bonuses and no Boku-related bonus restrictions on the platforms it assessed. That finding should not be treated as a guarantee for every casino or every promotion: a general welcome offer can still have payment-method exclusions, and an operator can alter its conditions.
The calculation is therefore straightforward: identify the offer, confirm that Pay by Phone or Boku deposits are eligible under its terms, then assess the bonus separately from the deposited amount. Where the terms exclude that funding method, the deposit may still reach the casino account, but it will not satisfy the offer’s qualifying condition. Where the terms include it, eligibility depends on meeting the remaining conditions of that promotion.
Deposit Limits Set by the Casino and the Network
A Boku deposit can be subject to two separate ceilings: the amount permitted by the casino for one payment and the amount the mobile network allows through its billing service. The lower applicable limit determines what can be deposited. A casino’s cashier limit does not override a restriction applied by the network.
Specialist casino reviews describe £30 as the standard UK Boku limit per transaction, while reporting that some casinos or network operators may permit £40 or £50. Those figures are not a dependable rule for every account: the available limit can differ by operator and payment arrangement.
Reports also disagree about the network-level cap. One account gives a limit of about £10 per transaction and £30 per day; another describes a £30 daily limit without specifying a separate per-transaction ceiling. These versions cannot be combined into a single confirmed transaction rule. The daily figure is the point they share, but it should still be treated as reported guidance rather than a universal promise.
A specialist review attributes enforcement of the daily cap to the mobile operator, not the casino. In practice, that means a casino may display an amount within its own permitted range while the network declines the payment because its daily allowance has been reached. Repeated attempts do not change the network’s accounting of payments already made that day.
The distinction matters when a deposit is rejected. A casino limit concerns what that operator will accept in one transaction; a network limit concerns what the phone account can process over the relevant period. The cashier may therefore allow an amount that cannot be completed through Boku. The exact limits should be checked against the payment terms shown by the casino and the mobile operator, rather than inferred from another site’s published figures.
Boku is a deposit-only method and cannot be used to receive winnings or cash out from a casino account.
Withdrawals and Other Ways to Fund an Account
Boku can move money into a casino account, but it cannot receive winnings. It is a deposit-only method: a successful SMS payment does not create a route for cashing out. The withdrawal arrangements therefore need to be considered separately from the way the account was funded.
A casino using Boku requires a separate withdrawal method to be registered. That may be a debit card, an e-wallet or a bank transfer, depending on the methods the operator supports. The casino’s withdrawal rules determine which options are available and whether account details need to be verified before a payment can be made. UK-licensed casinos cannot accept credit cards for gambling, so a credit card is not a suitable alternative funding route.
Neteller offers a possible bridge between Pay by Phone and casino payments. A specialist payment review describes funding a Neteller account through Boku, then using Neteller to deposit at a casino that accepts it. This is a route to check rather than a universal feature: Boku must be available for the Neteller funding step, and the casino must accept Neteller. Neither point follows simply from a casino offering another SMS payment option.
The distinction matters because a payment method can serve different roles at each stage. Boku may fund the casino account directly, or may be part of a route used to fund an e-wallet; it still does not become a withdrawal method. Neteller may be accepted for deposits, withdrawals, or both, subject to the casino’s own terms. The payment options shown in an account are more relevant than assumptions based on the method used for the first deposit.
Before depositing, the casino’s UK Gambling Commission licence should be checked on the Commission’s public register, and its cashier and withdrawal terms should be reviewed. A separate payout method is not an optional detail when Boku is used: it is the part of the payment arrangement that allows winnings to leave the account.
SMS Deposits, Slot Bonuses and Spin Conditions
A deposit by text message does not make a slot bonus automatic. The cashier payment and the promotion are separate parts of the transaction: the casino’s terms determine whether a Pay by Phone deposit qualifies, and any bonus becomes subject to its own expiry and play conditions. A balance shown in the account is not necessarily unrestricted cash.
The figures in a specialist review illustrate why the offer terms need reading as a calculation, not a headline. It described a deposit match of 100% capped at £100, with wagering set at 35 times the bonus. Those terms are an example, not a market-wide offer. The amount credited as bonus funds, the wagering base and any excluded games affect how much play is required before winnings can be withdrawn.
Timing can matter as much as the calculation. The same type of review reported bonus funds expiring within 30 days and free spins within 72 hours. These are reported offer conditions, not universal deadlines; the casino’s current promotion terms control. A player considering SMS deposit slots should establish whether the deposit qualifies, when the clock starts, which slots count towards wagering and what happens to unused bonus funds or spins at expiry.
Bonus deadlines are separate from British slot-play rules. Online slot autoplay is prohibited, and each spin must last at least 2.5 seconds. Stake caps also apply per game cycle: £5 for customers aged 25 and over, and £2 for those aged 18 to 24. The £5 cap for all adults took effect on 9 April 2025. These rules govern how slots operate; they do not extend a bonus deadline or alter wagering terms.
The practical sequence is therefore distinct: confirm that the mobile deposit qualifies for the promotion, calculate the stated wagering requirement, note the applicable expiry conditions, then account for the slot rules while playing. A promotion’s value depends on those conditions together, not on the advertised match alone.
What are the deposit limits at pay-by-mobile casinos?
Boku is typically limited to about £10 per transaction and £30 per day at network level. The standard UK maximum is £30 per transaction, although some casinos or networks may allow £40 or £50; PAYG users are also capped by their remaining phone credit.
How do I deposit with Boku at an online casino?
Choose Boku in the casino cashier, select an available amount, enter your mobile number and confirm the request with the SMS code. Wait for the cashier to confirm that the deposit was accepted.
How does Boku work?
Boku sends an SMS confirmation request for a casino deposit, and the charge is then made to your monthly mobile bill or deducted from your PAYG credit. It is a deposit-only method and cannot be used to withdraw casino funds.
What is the standard Boku deposit limit in the UK?
The standard limit is £30 per transaction. Some casinos or mobile networks may allow up to £40 or £50, while network-level limits can also restrict deposits to about £10 per transaction and £30 per day.
Why are UK casinos dropping Boku?
Operators have been moving away from Boku since 2023 because of compliance risk, replacing it with services such as Fonix or Siru Mobile, or removing pay-by-mobile options. The UK Gambling Commission did not introduce a Boku-specific ban.
Prepared by the Jeanniemarshall.com editorial staff.
