BGaming Casinos in the UK: Availability and Rules
Available in GBThe guide separates what UK slot rules confirm from game availability, bonus terms, mobile access and provider claims that need checking.
Table of Contents
- BGaming Slots Under UK Online-Slot Rules
- BGaming Games: What Availability Can Be Confirmed
- Checking Whether a UK Casino Carries BGaming
- BGaming Bonuses and the Cost of Playthrough
- Real-Money, Free-Play and Mobile Searches
- BGaming on Mobile: Availability Still Needs Checking
- BGaming Software and Casino Integration
- RTP and Volatility: BGaming Figures Not Verified
- Bonus Offers, Conditions and Payment Claims
- UK Gambling Regulation and BGaming Casino Claims
BGaming Slots Under UK Online-Slot Rules
A BGaming label does not change the rules that apply to an online slot in Great Britain. If a BGaming slot is offered by a UK-regulated casino, its stake and spin design sit within the same limits as other online slots. Those limits affect the amount that can be committed to a game cycle and the pace at which play can proceed; they do not establish which titles a casino carries or how any particular title is designed.
For players aged 25 and over, the maximum stake is £5 per game cycle. This limit took effect on 9 April 2025. For players aged 18 to 24, the maximum is £2 per game cycle, with that lower cap taking effect on 21 May 2025. The relevant amount is the stake for a game cycle, not a suggested spending target or a minimum. A lower stake remains possible, but a higher one cannot be used for an online slot under these rules.
The age distinction matters when assessing the cost of a session. The same slot and the same chosen stake can fall within the permitted maximum for one age group and exceed it for another. A game’s advertised features do not alter that calculation. Nor does the provider name: a BGaming title, if present, remains subject to the limit applicable to the player’s age.
When choosing a UK casino featuring BGaming, it helps to consider practical details alongside the games. The payout information below offers one useful point of reference.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days EvoSpin lists a payout speed of 1–3 business days, giving readers a clear timeframe to consider.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days Dieselwin lists payouts as taking 1–3 business days.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days SlotoSport gives a payout speed of 1–3 business days as a practical detail for players to weigh.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days x3bet lists a payout speed of 1–3 business days.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days Britsino states that payouts take 1–3 business days.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days WinBeast lists a payout timeframe of 1–3 business days.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days NightLuck gives a payout speed of 1–3 business days, a useful detail when reviewing its offering.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days BeOnBet lists payouts as taking 1–3 business days.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days Revery Play states a payout speed of 1–3 business days.
Payout speed: 1-3 business days Chanze lists a payout timeframe of 1–3 business days.
The cap is a ceiling on each cycle, not a statement about how much a session will cost. Repeated cycles can still accumulate spending. The permitted stake therefore should not be mistaken for a budget, a forecast of losses, or a measure of how long play will last. The rules set the maximum amount at risk in an individual cycle; they do not make the result predictable.
Spin pace and autoplay
British online slot design rules also prohibit autoplay. A player cannot set a slot to run through a sequence of spins automatically. The rules require at least 2.5 seconds between spins, setting a minimum interval rather than a promise that every game will run at exactly that speed.
That interval limits how quickly successive spins can begin, but it does not set a session length. The time spent in a game still depends on whether play continues and on the pauses between actions. Autoplay being unavailable also does not mean that a slot has no other controls or features; those would need to be assessed from the particular game rather than inferred from its supplier’s name.
No BGaming-specific spin feature follows from the general UK rules. In particular, the rules do not establish whether a particular BGaming slot has a certain reel layout, bonus round, payline structure or other mechanic. Those are game-level details, not consequences of the stake cap or minimum interval. A description that assigns such features to BGaming slots without identifying a confirmed title would turn a market-wide rule into an unsupported product claim.
What the limits mean in practice
A useful comparison starts with the player’s age and the stake shown for one game cycle. For an adult aged 25 or over, a cycle above £5 is outside the permitted maximum. For someone aged 18 to 24, the corresponding threshold is £2. The applicable cap does not change because a slot is described as a video slot, because it includes a feature round, or because the casino presents it under a particular provider heading.
The minimum interval works differently from the stake cap. It governs the spacing between spins, not the amount staked on each one. A compliant pace cannot make a stake above the applicable cap acceptable, and a stake below the cap does not remove the requirement for the interval. These are separate constraints: one limits exposure per game cycle; the other limits the speed of play.
The wording “game cycle” is important when interpreting a displayed stake. It refers to the individual play event governed by the slot rules, rather than a whole visit to the casino. It should not be read as a session-wide spending allowance. For a player keeping track of expenditure, the total committed across repeated cycles remains the relevant personal figure, even when each individual stake is within the legal ceiling.
- Use a stake of £5 or less for players aged 25+
- Use a stake of £2 or less for players aged 18-24
- Observe the minimum 2.5-second interval between spins
- Exceed the age-based maximum stake per game cycle
- Use autoplay features to run sequences of spins
- Mistake the stake cap for a session budget or loss forecast
The same distinction prevents an easy but misleading conclusion about value. A lower permitted stake does not make a game more favourable, and a slower sequence of spins does not establish a better expected return. Neither rule supplies a game’s payout rate or volatility. Those figures depend on the individual title and cannot be derived from UK stake and design requirements.
For BGaming in particular, the defensible point is limited but useful: any online slot offered under that name to British players must operate within the applicable age-based stake cap, must not use autoplay, and must observe the minimum interval between spins. The rules describe the conditions for online slot play in the market; they do not confirm a BGaming title, its mechanics or its presence in a particular casino.
BGaming Games: What Availability Can Be Confirmed
A request for BGaming games at UK casinos has two separate parts: whether a title belongs to the provider’s catalogue, and whether a particular casino makes that title available to its customers. A provider name on a page does not, by itself, settle either point. It may identify a supplier, describe a general catalogue or appear in material that does not establish which games can be opened at a UK-licensed casino.
That means there is no reliable basis for naming a “best” BGaming game, drawing up a UK title list or attaching features to particular games. A title that appears in an unverified list is not made suitable for a UK recommendation by being repeated across other pages. Repetition is not a distribution record.
The same distinction applies to lists of casinos said to offer BGaming. A list needs to connect a named title to an operator’s live UK offering, rather than simply associate the operator with a provider. Without that connection, the list may describe an old catalogue, a market outside Great Britain or a general supplier relationship. Those are different claims, and combining them produces a misleading picture of what can actually be played.
The words “BGaming casino games” can also be read as though the provider itself were a casino. They describe games, not necessarily the business that accepts a deposit, records a wager or pays a balance. For a UK player, the relevant product is the title made available through a licensed operator; a provider name alone does not identify the operator or establish the game’s availability there.
This matters when evaluating claims about a provider’s catalogue. A list of titles may be useful as an overview of games associated with a studio, but it does not prove that each title is present in a UK casino lobby. Nor does a casino’s general statement about its suppliers establish that every game from each supplier is offered. The narrower claim—this named title is available at this named UK operator—is the one that needs substantiation.
Accordingly, no named BGaming title can be responsibly placed in a UK “best games” selection here. That is not a judgement about the quality of any game. It is a limit on what a recommendation can mean without an identifiable title and a confirmed UK route to play it. Ratings, themes and game mechanics would not repair the missing link between a title and its availability.
A provider name on a page does not confirm that a specific game is available at a UK-licensed casino; it may only describe a general catalogue or a supplier relationship.
Free-play claims require the same care. A page describing a BGaming game as free to try does not establish that the game is accessible in free-play mode at a UK casino. Free access, where offered, is a separate feature from real-money availability; one cannot be inferred from the other. Likewise, references to free spins do not identify a BGaming title or establish that a promotion applies to it.
Claims about crypto casinos should not be folded into a UK list of licensed options. Offshore casinos operate outside the UK regulatory framework, so their game pages cannot establish availability through a UK-licensed operator. A title advertised on an offshore site is not evidence that the same title is offered to British customers under a UKGC licence.
For a useful comparison, the evidence needs to be specific enough to distinguish a provider label from a playable game: a title name, the operator offering it, and a current UK-facing listing that connects the two. Without that level of detail, a catalogue claim remains a catalogue claim, not a confirmed UK choice.
Checking Whether a UK Casino Carries BGaming
A casino’s UKGC licence and its game catalogue answer different questions. The licence concerns whether the operator may offer remote gambling in Great Britain; it does not, by itself, show which providers or titles appear in that operator’s lobby. A provider list therefore needs to be checked against the individual casino, not inferred from the operator’s regulatory status.
The most useful evidence is a current listing on the casino’s own site or in its games lobby. A provider filter can help, but the result should identify BGaming by name rather than rely on a similar-looking title, a promotional image or a broad category such as “slots”. If a game page gives a provider name, that is more specific than a general casino page describing its catalogue.
Availability can differ between operators, and a listing can change. A directory that names casinos without showing when or how each entry was checked may not reflect the current lobby. The same applies to old reviews, screenshots and social posts: they can point to a place to investigate, but they do not establish that the game is still available there.
A practical check has two separate parts:
- Operator status: confirm that the casino holds the relevant UKGC licence for serving customers in Great Britain. The Gambling Commission’s register concerns licensing; it is not a catalogue of games.
- Provider presence: look for BGaming in the casino’s current provider list or search its lobby for titles explicitly attributed to BGaming.
- Current access: check whether the listing is visible on the operator’s own UK-facing service, rather than on a page for a different market or an unrelated site using a similar name.
The distinction matters when a page advertises “licensed BGaming casinos”. “Licensed” may refer to the casino’s authority to operate, not to a separate approval of every provider name displayed in its lobby. A UKGC licence should not be read as confirmation of a particular supplier relationship.
“Live casino” also needs a more exact check. A live-casino section may be a category on the operator’s site; it does not establish that BGaming supplies live-dealer tables or operates a live studio. Confirmation would require an explicit provider attribution for the relevant live product. A studio claim should be treated in the same way: it needs to be stated by the operator or provider, not inferred from the word “live” in a menu.
A complete BGaming casino list cannot safely be treated as permanent. The reliable unit is an individual operator’s current catalogue, checked for the named provider and the relevant UK service. Where that listing does not make the attribution clear, the provider’s presence remains unresolved; a casino’s licence, reputation or general claim to offer a large game selection cannot fill that gap.
Checking BGaming Availability
Confirm that the casino holds a current UKGC licence for serving customers in Great Britain.
Search the casino’s current provider list or lobby specifically for the BGaming name.
Ensure the listing is visible on the operator’s own UK-facing service and not a different market site.
The distinction is operational rather than cosmetic. The casino controls the player account and the games it makes available through its service, while the provider name identifies the supplier associated with a title. Each claim needs evidence at its own level: a licence record for the operator, and a current catalogue entry for BGaming.
BGaming Bonuses and the Cost of Playthrough
A bonus advertised alongside a BGaming game is an operator promotion, not a payment from the game provider. The label alone says nothing about whether the offer is available, what balance it applies to or how much play is required before any bonus-derived funds can be withdrawn. Those details belong to the casino’s terms.
For bonuses offered by UK-licensed remote gambling operators, the UK Gambling Commission’s cap on wagering requirements for bonus funds took effect on 19 December 2025. The maximum requirement is 10× the bonus funds. In practical terms, if a qualifying bonus is represented by B, the maximum playthrough attached to those funds is 10B. The cap limits the wagering multiplier; it does not turn the bonus into cash immediately or remove other offer conditions.
That distinction matters when comparing a deposit offer with a no-deposit promotion. A no-deposit offer may not require a payment to receive the bonus, but “no deposit” does not, by itself, mean “no wagering”. If playthrough applies, the bonus may remain subject to it. A deposit offer has a separate cost at the outset: the qualifying payment. The relevant comparison is therefore not simply whether money must be deposited, but how much of the bonus can become withdrawable and what conditions stand between the bonus and that outcome.
The 10× limit is a ceiling, not a promise that every offer uses the full allowance. A lower requirement can reduce the amount of play needed, while other terms can still affect the result. The headline value is not the final amount available to withdraw. A useful assessment separates the qualifying deposit, bonus funds, wagering requirement and any stated withdrawal conditions rather than treating them as one figure.
For searches about a BGaming casino’s first-deposit bonus or a BGaming no-deposit offer, the provider name should not be read as proof that a particular promotion exists. Nor does a small advertised deposit establish the total cost of qualifying for a bonus: the offer terms determine what must be paid and what wagering applies. A casino’s current promotion page and its full terms are the relevant records for that calculation.
The same arithmetic applies whether the promotion is presented beside a named game or across a casino lobby. What changes is the offer’s own wording, not the UK wagering ceiling. If the terms describe bonus funds subject to playthrough, the multiplier can be compared with the statutory maximum; if they do not explain how the requirement is calculated, the promotional headline is not enough to establish the cash outcome.
Attention The 10× wagering cap is a ceiling on the multiplier; it does not remove other conditions like eligibility rules, expiry dates, or withdrawal limits.
The financial test is straightforward: identify the bonus funds, apply the stated wagering multiplier, then distinguish that playthrough from the deposit and from any separate withdrawal conditions. Without the operator’s actual terms, a claim of a “latest” or “new” BGaming bonus has no calculable value. A provider association is not a substitute for the numbers that determine the cost.
Real-Money, Free-Play and Mobile Searches
Real-money play, free-play access and mobile use are separate questions. A casino might support one without supporting the others, and a general claim about a provider does not confirm that a particular BGaming title is available in any of these formats.
For real-money play in Great Britain, the relevant account is the casino account, not an account with the game supplier. A remote gambling operator offering play to British customers must hold a UKGC licence; the operator handles deposits, payouts and the terms governing the account. Online gambling is legal from age 18 at a licensed site. The fact that a casino is licensed does not, by itself, establish that it carries BGaming games. Nor does a game appearing in a lobby establish that a particular version or format is available.
Free play has a different financial outcome: it does not involve staking a cash balance in the same way as real-money play. But a casino’s general free-play feature is not proof that a BGaming slot has a playable demo there. Demo access, where offered, would need to be shown for the specific title and operator. A game image, catalogue reference or promotional mention is not equivalent to a working free-play version.
Mobile access is another independent condition. A casino may have a mobile site or app without every title being accessible through it. Conversely, a browser-based game may not require a separate download, but that general possibility cannot establish BGaming compatibility on a particular operator’s mobile service. The relevant evidence is the title opening and functioning through that operator’s mobile interface, not simply the presence of a mobile casino.
Searches for real-money BGaming slots, free demos and mobile play therefore point to different checks. The operator’s game listing can indicate whether a title is offered; the game itself must show whether a demo mode exists; and the mobile interface must confirm whether it runs there. None of those checks should be inferred from a provider name alone.
A bonus code or free-spin promotion is also not evidence that a BGaming game is included. The promotion’s eligible games and conditions belong to the operator’s offer, while the game’s availability is a separate matter. A bonus label cannot turn an unlisted title into an available one.
The practical distinction is simple: real-money availability concerns a licensed operator and its cash account; free play concerns access to a demo; mobile play concerns compatibility with the operator’s mobile service. BGaming-specific confirmation is needed for each. Without it, claims about a real-money title, a demo version or mobile support would go beyond what can be established.
BGaming on Mobile: Availability Still Needs Checking
A casino that works on a phone does not necessarily offer every provider or title through its mobile version. The presence of a casino app, or a mobile-friendly site, is not evidence that BGaming games are included. Availability has to be checked at the level of the operator and the particular game.
Mobile access routes
An app and a mobile browser are separate routes. A game appearing in one does not confirm that it is available in the other.
The first check is whether the casino’s mobile lobby identifies BGaming as a provider. If it has a provider filter, search there; otherwise, use the lobby’s own search field and inspect any displayed game information. A result on the desktop site is not enough to establish that the same title is accessible on a phone. The mobile lobby may present a different selection, and the relevant question is whether the game can actually be opened there.
An app and a mobile browser are separate routes. A game appearing in one does not confirm that it is available in the other. The operator’s own information should make clear which route is supported; where it does not, the title’s availability remains unresolved rather than assumed. A link or promotional image that names a provider is not a substitute for an accessible game entry.
This distinction matters for searches about BGaming casino sites and mobile slots. The phrase “BGaming on mobile” can refer to several different things: an operator’s site working on a phone, a particular title loading in a mobile browser, or a casino app containing that title. Those are separate checks. General claims about phone compatibility cannot establish all three, and no provider-wide mobile conclusion should be drawn from a single operator’s listing.
For a UK casino, mobile convenience does not change the applicable remote gambling rules. A legal operator serving British customers must hold a UKGC licence. The same online slot design requirements apply on mobile as elsewhere: autoplay is prohibited, and each spin must be separated by at least 2.5 seconds. These rules describe the regulated product; they do not confirm that BGaming is present in a casino’s mobile catalogue.
The practical evidence is therefore narrow: a current entry in the operator’s own mobile lobby, with the game available to launch through the stated route. If the provider name or title cannot be found there, the casino’s general mobile support proves nothing about BGaming. Likewise, an old listing may not establish present availability. A current check is necessary because catalogues can change, and an app-store description may describe the casino without identifying its game suppliers.
A mobile review should report only what the operator’s current interface demonstrates: whether a BGaming title is listed and whether it opens in the browser or app being assessed. Without that evidence, “mobile compatible” is too broad to be useful. It combines a working device interface with a game catalogue claim, although only the first may have been established.
BGaming Software and Casino Integration
A casino’s use of gaming software is a business-to-business arrangement, not a separate player account or a direct route to play. The operator provides the consumer-facing casino; the software supplier provides games for that operator to make available. A provider name in a casino’s promotional copy is therefore not, by itself, evidence that its games are currently integrated into the site.
For BGaming, the distinction matters because “software available” can mean several different things: a supplier has a relationship with an operator, a title appears in a particular casino’s catalogue, or the title is accessible to a specific customer. These are not interchangeable claims. A general statement about a partnership would not establish that a particular BGaming game is live in the UK-facing lobby.
Software integrations can change; search results, old reviews, and third-party lists may describe a past catalogue rather than the current one.
A useful check starts with the operator’s own games catalogue or provider filter. If BGaming is listed, that indicates a claimed provider presence, but the individual title still needs checking. A game page or in-game information panel can help confirm the title and identify the operator through which it is being offered. Search results, old review pages and third-party lists may describe a past catalogue rather than the current one; software integrations can change without those pages being updated.
The UK regulatory distinction is also important. The UK Gambling Commission issues licences to gambling businesses and to individuals performing relevant roles. Its register is not a catalogue of every game supplier used by every casino. A supplier’s software status cannot replace the operator’s UKGC licence, and a casino’s licence does not establish that it carries BGaming. Both claims need to be considered separately.
The same separation applies to the interface. A casino may present games through its own lobby and account system, while the game itself is supplied by a third party. The branding or layout of a casino page does not establish who developed the underlying game, how it was integrated, or whether the title is currently available. Those details require confirmation from the operator’s current catalogue or the game’s own information screen.
Accordingly, a BGaming software review for the UK should distinguish documented operator licensing from evidence of a live BGaming integration. Without a current title listing, claims about a particular casino’s software setup remain unsubstantiated. A provider label is a starting point, not a completed audit.
RTP and Volatility: BGaming Figures Not Verified
A ranking of BGaming slots by return to player (RTP), volatility or maximum win needs comparable, title-specific figures. The provider name alone cannot establish which game has the highest RTP, the largest possible payout or the lowest variance. Without those figures, a ranked list would imply precision it cannot support.
RTP is a theoretical measure of the share of stakes a game returns over extended play. It is not a forecast for an individual session: short-term results can differ substantially. Volatility describes how wins are distributed, not how much a game is expected to return. A high-volatility game may have less frequent wins with greater variation in outcomes; a low-volatility one may produce a different pattern. Neither label, on its own, identifies the better choice or the likely result.
The same distinction matters when comparing average RTP with a particular slot’s RTP. An average needs a defined set of games and a consistent method of calculation. A title-level figure needs to be linked to that title’s published game information. A claim about the highest BGaming RTP, or a list of the provider’s highest-return slots, is not meaningful without both.
Maximum win is a separate measure. It describes a stated upper payout under the game’s rules; it does not indicate how often that payout occurs. A progressive jackpot is different again: its prize depends on the jackpot feature and its operation, so it cannot be inferred from RTP or volatility alone. “Most popular” also requires a defined measure, such as operator play data, rather than an assumption based on a game’s name or theme.
BGaming Slot Metrics
Comparisons of RTP, volatility, and maximum wins must use title-specific data from the game’s own information panel.
For any BGaming title, comparisons should use the game’s own displayed information and distinguish RTP from variance, maximum win and jackpot terms. A “new western” theme does not establish any of those figures, and a low-variance label should not be treated as a promise of steady returns. Until comparable title-level data is available, no BGaming slot can responsibly be identified as the highest-RTP, highest-payout or lowest-variance option.
Bonus Offers, Conditions and Payment Claims
A bonus shown beside a BGaming title is an offer from the casino operator, not from the game provider. Its value depends on the operator’s published terms: who qualifies, which payment methods count, which games are eligible and what must happen before any resulting balance can be withdrawn. A “no-deposit” label does not, by itself, establish that a promotion has no conditions.
For UK players, wagering requirements on bonus funds are capped at ten times the bonus amount. The cap took effect on 19 December 2025. That limit does not remove other terms. Eligibility rules, expiry dates, qualifying games and withdrawal conditions still need to be read as part of the same offer. The headline value alone is not the amount available to withdraw.
Payment claims require separate checking. A deposit bonus may apply only to specified methods, while another method may be excluded from the promotion or affect withdrawal processing under the operator’s terms. The payment page and the bonus terms should agree; a general claim that a casino accepts a method does not establish that the method qualifies for a particular offer.
Credit cards cannot be used to fund remote gambling in the UK, including through an e-wallet topped up by credit card. That restriction is distinct from whether a casino accepts other payment methods or includes them in a bonus. A Bitcoin-related claim also needs careful interpretation: it does not establish that the operator is authorised to serve UK players or that a payment route is available under UK rules.
The useful comparison is therefore between the complete offer and the payment method actually used, not between bonus headlines. For promotions associated with BGaming games, the operator’s current terms determine the conditions. The game name does not change the wagering cap, make an excluded payment method eligible or replace the operator’s responsibility for deposits and payouts.
UK Gambling Regulation and BGaming Casino Claims
The UK Gambling Commission oversees gambling in the United Kingdom, including remote casino gambling. In Great Britain, it is the sole regulator for commercial gambling. Its remit covers remote gambling offered to consumers there even when the equipment used to provide the service is located elsewhere.
The Commission issues operating licences to gambling businesses and personal licences to individuals working in relevant roles. These are different forms of authorisation: an operating licence concerns the business providing gambling, while a personal licence concerns an individual. A casino’s regulatory position therefore rests on the operator’s authorisation, not on a game-provider label used in its marketing.
That distinction matters when assessing claims about BGaming casinos in the UK. A UKGC licence indicates that an operator is licensed for the relevant gambling activity; it does not, by itself, establish which suppliers or titles appear in that operator’s catalogue. Nor does a provider name in a casino description amount to a regulatory endorsement of that casino or confirmation of a particular game.
“Best BGaming online casinos in the UK” is therefore not a regulatory category. It combines two separate questions: whether a gambling business is authorised to serve customers in Great Britain, and whether BGaming games are actually available through that business. The Commission’s role addresses the first question. The operator’s current information is needed for the second.
This framework also prevents a common category error: treating a supplier’s presence, a casino’s licence and a specific game’s availability as interchangeable evidence. They are not. A responsible assessment keeps the licence claim attached to the operator and treats any claim about BGaming titles as a separate matter requiring confirmation.
Must a casino be Gambling Commission-licensed to offer Amatic slots to UK players?
Yes. Amatic games reach UK players through UK Gambling Commission-licensed operators, which hold the licence for the casino and its customer services.
Are Amatic games licensed and legal to play in the UK?
Yes. Amatic Industries holds a UK Gambling Software (Remote) licence, and its games are offered to British players through UKGC-licensed casinos.
What are the wagering requirements at Amatic casino bonuses in the UK?
For bonus funds, UK rules cap wagering requirements at 10 times the bonus amount. The casino’s bonus terms set the specific requirements, and some UK offers have 0× wagering on free-spin wins.
Can Amatic slots be played on a mobile phone in the UK?
Yes. Amatic games generally run in a mobile browser as HTML5 games, without a download.
Which licensed UK casinos carry Amatic slots?
Operators listed as carrying Amatic games include Betfred, Bet365, William Hill, 32Red, Sky Vegas, 888casino, Betway, Unibet, PokerStars, Ladbrokes, Paddy Power, Virgin Games, Casumo, Jackpotjoy, kwiff, Betvictor and Betfair. Check the operator’s current game or provider list, as availability can vary.
Published by the Jeanniemarshall.com team.
